Why it’s time to think differently about Covid

For more than a year, personal freedoms have been curtailed to keep Covid at bay. That looks likely to change, with ministers proposing to lift many of the remaining restrictions in England on 19 July. The details, set out on Monday, have sparked intense debate. Prof Neil Ferguson, from Imperial College London, whose modelling led to the first lockdown, has said it is a gamble, but one worth taking. What is unarguable is that the nature of the pandemic in the UK has changed – and with it so should many of our assumptions.

Covid is no longer the deadly virus it was. The rollout of the vaccination programme has altered everything, reducing both the individual risk and the wider one to the health system. Back in January, about one in 10 infections could be expected to translate into a hospital admission 10 days later. Now that figure appears to be somewhere between one in 40 and one in 50. What is more, those ending up in hospital seem to be less sick, and need less intensive treatment. The risk of death, as a result, has reduced even further. In January about one in 60 cases resulted in someone dying. Today it’s fewer than one in 1,000.

But this does not mean England – and the rest of the UK for that matter – is not heading for a significant third wave. Infection rates are rising, and if they rise enough, that has the potential to cause a significant number of hospitalisations, possibly 1,000 a day before summer is out. Many may wonder how this can happen given how effective the vaccines are. Individually, those who have had two doses are at a very tiny risk of getting seriously ill, but with infection rates high it means many people are taking that tiny risk at the same time. Add to that those who are unvaccinated or for whom the vaccines do not work as well and you can get a lot of admissions to hospital.

But serious illness happens all the time. In the depths of winter there can be 1,000 admissions a day for respiratory infections. Flu alone killed more than 20,000 people in England in the winter of 2017-18. There was no talk of the need to introduce restrictions or curtail freedoms then. “That is the context we need to start seeing Covid in,” says Prof Robert Dingwall, a sociologist at Nottingham Trent University.

But why even take the risk? Why not – as scientists on Independent Sage have suggested -wait until the adult vaccination rollout is complete in September? There was always going to be an “exit wave” once restrictions were lifted. And government scientists are hopeful the wall of immunity built up by natural infection and the vaccine rollout so far will soon kick in and flatten the wave. The fact remains interventions are not harm-free, so in the end it comes down to difficult judgements about trade-offs.

Perhaps the clearest example of this is what is happening with schools where there are currently more than 500,000 children at home self-isolating in England because they were deemed to have close contact with an infected person at school. That’s 20 children out of school for every positive case. This approach started in September, before vaccines had even completed their clinical trials. The idea was to contain spread of the virus to protect vulnerable adults – children are at incredibly low risk from Covid.

Now that all over-50s have had the chance of a second jab – these are the age groups where 99% of Covid deaths have occurred – the benefits of quarantining children like this is hugely reduced, while the costs in terms of disruption to education are clear to see. Ministers say they will change this approach in time for September, but should this have been avoided given how much school has been disrupted already? There are other arguments for why it should be now.

“Covid will never go away,” says Prof Paul Hunter, from the University of East Anglia. “It’s inevitable that we’re going to catch it repeatedly for the rest of our lives, whether we have had the vaccine or not. “The issues becomes not whether it is safe to lift all restrictions, but when would it be safest to do so.” Waiting any longer could make the situation worse, he believes, extending the exit wave into the autumn when schools are back and the flu season is getting under way. It was a view echoed by England’s chief medical officer Prof Chris Whitty, who said it had his personal backing when the government unveiled its plans on Monday.

But the idea of letting a virus spread when we have spent so long trying to do the opposite requires a psychological shift. Dr Muge Cevik, an infectious disease expert at University of St Andrews, says this will take time. “We need to accept Covid is here. We won’t be able to completely stop the spread. We are now at the stage of managing the virus.”

She would like to see more emphasis now on recovery, tackling the backlog in hospital care for non-Covid treatments, dealing with the economic fallout and loss of jobs and the emotional and mental health toll the pandemic has had.

But none of this is without risks. What if infection rates keep rising and that wall of immunity is slow to kick in? Understandable concerns have also been raised about those who are at risk because they have conditions such as blood cancer which mean the vaccines do not work as well or who have a higher chance of exposure because of their jobs, such as shop or factory workers.

There is also Long Covid to contend with – although the risks of this are far from fully understood. We are, perhaps, the first country to find ourselves in this situation, where we are attempting to return to normal in the face of a rapidly rising rate of infection and a more infectious variant, Delta. Others will soon face similar dilemmas. It’s why the world will be watching what happens on these shores.

 

Source: Why it’s time to think differently about Covid – BBC News

Testimonials

We first ordered products from Hygiene UK at the start of the pandemic as our usual suppliers could not supply, and had increased their prices drastically. We were offered competitively priced and good quality PPE at a time when not many suppliers could. You delivered timely deliveries to all of my locations, and your team are always friendly and helpful. I will continue to work with you when required.

Great products and pricing, and the team are always helpful and friendly.

We've used Hygiene UK many times and have nothing but good things to say. Great Prices, reliable & quick delivery. We use Hygiene UK to supply our blue-chip clients so confidence is a must! Thoroughly recommend!

A vast range of PPE products at competitive prices, but crucially Hygiene UK's expertise behind the products, and the quality of them, is second-to-none.

A great company to deal with, extremely reliable with a good range of products. Excellent product knowledge, great communication & customer service, fair prices and fast delivery.

Hygiene UK is great business providing essential supplies to essential services.

Huge range of products at great prices. At a time of desperate need many were taking advantage of people, but not Hygiene UK. They have helped us and have been nothing but perfect. If you’re looking for masks, gloves, aprons, etc please give the team at Hygiene UK a call!

Pleasure to deal with, great communication and overall service levels. Highly recommended.

Pleasure to deal with Hygiene UK Ltd, quick service and always available to answer questions.

Get in touch

We would love to hear from you whether it be a business or product enquiry. Complete the form below and submit.

    FAQs

    Find what you need in our FAQ's...

    All the usual methods of communication can be used, phone, email, and the contact form on the website. Check out the website footer for our contact information. Additionally if you need a face to face meeting we are more than happy to come visit.

    Hygiene UK offer next working day delivery when ordering before 1pm Monday to Friday. If we can fast track your order, let us know your timescales and we'll endeavour to assist you.

    The manufacturer of the P3 Protect respirator has pledged to become Net Zero by 2030.
    In order to calculate their carbon footprint measurements they use the SME Climate Hub: smeclimatehub.org/start-measuring/

    They’re also graduates of the Climate Fit course, that helps SMEs reduce their carbon emissions and join the collective race to Net Zero.

    They monitor their own Scope 3 emissions as part of their carbon reduction plan. This includes their downstream supply chain. For example, transport, storage and distribution. Product end of life’ (downstream) measurement depends upon the method and the extent to which this is mitigated by closed or open-loop recycling and other factors.

    For ‘cradle-to-the grave’ carbon output, the factory is creating their own carbon reduction plan, including waste and everything else, to the point that a product leaves the factory gates.

    As a Cop26 Hero of Net Zero award winner, they are constantly looking at ways to limit their carbon footprint and continue as far as possible, without reliance on offset.

    Whatever emissions remain in the atmosphere are removed elsewhere.

    The manufacturer has signed up to Gold Standard, which is considered the best in the world. They offset the remainder of their carbon through the purchase of Gold Standard-certified carbon credits into sustainable projects around the world: https://www.goldstandard.org
    They don't have larger company statutory reporting requirements, so are entering into the NHS supply chain with Evergreen, the Sustainable Supplier Assessment. This self-assessment and reporting tool shares sustainability credentials. They are currently tier 1 of 4 and working towards reducing emissions further.

    The sustainability narrative for manufacturing Net Zero PPE is underpinned by:

    • Sustainable design for manufacture, results in production and consumption patterns with the mantra "Reduce, Reuse, Recycle"
    • Reducing the amount of energy required to manufacture, use, clean and recycle products
    • Opting for renewable energy
    • Only using recyclable and/or reusable materials, including reusable and recyclable filters to limit material ending up in landfill

    An IVD Medical Device is defined in the IVDR as “any medical device which is a reagent, reagent product, calibrator, control material, kit, instrument, apparatus, piece of equipment, software or system, whether used alone or in combination, intended by the manufacturer to be used in vitro for the examination of specimens derived from the human body.

    In vitro diagnostics (IVDs) are tests that can detect disease, conditions and infections. In vitro simply means 'in glass', meaning these tests are typically conducted in test tubes, cassettes and similar equipment, as opposed to in vivo tests, which are conducted in the body itself.

    Read more FAQs

    Copyright © 2023 Hygiene UK

    Registered in England & Wales. Company Number: 12595581. VAT Registration: 348 0375 93

    Website from Skratch